When Hillary Clinton declared at a high-dollar fundraiser earlier this month that half of Donald Trump's supporters belong in a "basket of deplorables" and are thus "irredeemable," it was widely depicted as some sort of extemporaneous gaffe. She immediately launched into crisis-control mode, expressing regret for using the word "half"; her own running mate even rebuked the remark. But Hillary's proclamation wasn't a slip of the tongue or verbal miscue—it was a very deliberate echo of a preacherly politicking style that the Clintons have honed over the course of decades. Their MO, now as ever, is to heap scorn on ordinary Americans for harboring unenlightened opinions while diverting attention from the structural factors that coalesced to sour folks against the status quo.
The narrative is already being set. International financiers, central bankers and media personalities are consistently mentioning the great danger of the “populists.” They say the deplorables are going to destroy the world. This is nonsense, of course. The world has already been destroyed by the banking elite and their cronies, but, the average person doesn’t really grasp this. We have to educate them quickly because we are about to be targeted as scapegoats for one of the greatest engineered fiscal catastrophes of all time.
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton appeared to have trouble coordinating her left eye during a campaign speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Monday – the same eye that had to be outfitted with a prism correction lens years earlier.
Even in the face of coordinated jihadist terrorist attacks in New York, New Jersey, and Minnesota, the Obama administration is continuing to settle throughout the United States Muslim migrants from Middle Eastern and African war zones.
Just what is it that qualifies one to be a soldier? What qualities make one a “qualified soldier”? I can think of ten things, and they have nothing to do with bravery, duty, honor, country, valor, courage, patriotism, nationalism, pride, or heroism.
Clinton on Monday tried, quite remarkably, to claim any terror attempts on the U.S. between now and the election are the work of ISIS sympathizers who want her to lose. Why? -- Well, according to Clinton, they want the Republican presidential hopeful in the Oval Office because he’ll help them recruit.
The National Rifle Association said of the report: “Melbourne’s recent experience should serve as yet another example of the futility of gun control measures that burden the rights of the law-abiding. Given the ease with which Melbourne’s criminals arm themselves despite the severity of their country’s gun control regime, Clinton and Obama would be wise to look past Australia when putting together their next gun control speech.”
If you haven’t heard, California is expected to vote on several gun-related measures in this upcoming November elections. The measures proposed by Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom have stirred up a bit of controversy as gunowners are beginning to wonder if they have any right to keep California government out of their homes.
Hillary Clinton is taking the day off again, she needs the rest. Sleep well Hillary – see you at the debate! -- Trump has made it a point throughout the campaign to call attention to the Democrat nominee’s stamina, or lack thereof.
Of course, it is no surprise, as the Bushes have long regarded Bill Clinton as a surrogate son, and Hillary as an in-law and partner in crime. American politics is inbred like that, and the power spoils. Here we are at the crossroads of a quarter century of decline at the hands of these two families, and they are now teaming up openly in desperate plea for the nation to keep them on as the ruling dynasty.
Princeton Professor Julian Zelizer says that “something shocking” is set to rock the presidential race and that “we should all hold on to our seats” in anticipation of an October surprise that could take the form of a national security crisis.
In recent months the mainstream media has worked itself into a frenzy trying to defend Hillary from the various scandals surrounding her campaign. There is seemingly no end to the “plumes of smoke” emanating from the Clinton camp including questions over Benghazi, missing emails, pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, strange “medical episodes”, etc, etc, etc. All the while, the press simply can’t bring themselves to understand why voters never quite view her as a trustworthy candidate.